Reflection

What I Have Learned at Holy Cross

           I began my Holy Cross career by taking a class entitled “The Meaning of Life.” We read Viktor Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning, The Book of Job, Plato’s Dialogues, Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations, and more. The class, perhaps for the first time in my life, sparked an interest in the meaning of life and the significance of suffering. After all our reading and discussion of what makes life meaningful, our final assignment was to do a research project on someone whose life and writings exemplify the meaning of life, and to share what we thought this meaning was. I chose Mother Teresa and paraphrased the Greatest Commandment, saying, “I want to live a meaningful life, like Mother Teresa, by doing all I can to love and serve God and my brothers and sisters on Earth.”

           I was saying more than I knew. I had forgotten what I wrote in this final Montserrat paper. As I re-read sections of it to write this reflection, I expected to disagree with what I wrote as a freshman. I do not disagree at all. I believe what I wrote in freshman year now more than before. What has changed throughout my 4 years at Holy Cross is my understanding of what it means to love God above all things and my neighbor as myself.

        My education has introduced me to saints, martyrs, and holy fools. When I said, “to love and serve God and my brothers and sisters on Earth,” I think I, with the best intentions, meant, “to be a good person.” Not to be too weird or over-the-top about the faith, but to be kind, pleasant, and helpful to others. To go to church on Sundays, some other days as well. But even then, I felt a longing for something deeper. The saints, martyrs, and holy fools I have encountered showed me what it means to truly and deeply love God and neighbor. They are more than what we think of as a “good person.” A good person is kind to his friends, maybe even to those he does not like, but he does not necessarily die rather than renounce his faith. A good person is grateful when things are going well in his life, St. Paul sang a hymn of praise when he was imprisoned. A good person goes to Church on Sundays out of mere habit, a saint goes because he recognizes it is Heaven on Earth.

           I encountered these saints and deepened my faith thanks to my education, both inside and outside the classroom, at Holy Cross. I like to think that I got the experience of a Holy Cross of which St. Ignatius would be proud. I think he would have negative feelings towards a lot of what happens on the Hill, but I am happy to report that hope silently lives on here. A handful of great professors have taught me language, literature, theology, and philosophy, and they have nourished my mind with wisdom (and folly). They have taught me what it means to live out our noble mission statement, to be “men and women for and with others,” but they have taught me this by teaching me the necessary prerequisite to all love: to know Love Himself. To do all for the greater glory of God and to live a meaningful life.

A Reflection on Graduation

Unsurprisingly, I anticipate the end of the semester with mixed emotions. This time of the year always brings fatigue, a frazzled emotional state, and the eagerness for rest. As a graduating senior, I look forward to starting a new chapter in my life as I leave with my bachelor’s degree. Yet my readiness for the summer is tempered by sadness at departing Holy Cross permanently. Alas, such is the way of life’s great changes. I doubt I am the only member of the graduating class to feel this way.

Closing out my brief but vivid tenure at the Fenwick Review, I wanted to take the opportunity to share some thoughts I’d recently had on the nature of graduation. I will not attempt to erase the melancholic aspects of transition. Not only is that feat beyond my writing ability, I don’t think it would even be healthy. Yet as someone who believes there is no human experience which cannot be enriched by philosophical consideration, I hope that my reflection will, without negating the emotional reality of graduation, offer some consolation to those who share my conflicted feelings and some entertainment to those who don’t.

Over the last semester, I have increasingly been confronted by a novel emotion. It should not be confused with pride in others, but like pride, it’s connected to times I’ve seen my friends, acquaintances, and unknown peers come into their own. These last months have been especially rich in opportunities for Holy Cross students to show off their talents. As I write this, the Fenwick Scholar presentation and academic conference are a few days away, and seniors in the honors program are completing their theses. Music majors have been giving their end of the year recitals over the last few weeks. We had one theatrical production last month and are in the middle of another now. The dance ensemble performed for a full theater on April 12th. Battle of the Bands was held on the 20th. And in general, I witness my friends take on new responsibilities as they prepare for new jobs, new internships, or whatever comes after undergraduate education in the case of other ’24 students. These are the times I’ve recently seen my peers flourish as individuals. Perhaps you have your own examples from sports, or service work, or something else.

I have said that the emotion connected to these experiences is not mere pride. Pride in others is a familiar emotion that I’ve had throughout my life. This emotion is newer, and it relates to the fact that the people in question are now burgeoning adults obtaining independence in the world — and, for the first time, substantially affecting the world with their actions. I think it is easiest to explain the feeling with a quotation:

“It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and goddesses, to remember that the dullest, most uninteresting person you can talk to may one day be a creature which, if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare. All day long we are, in some degree, helping each other to one or the other of these destinations.”— C.S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory

Lewis was ultimately referring to human status after death with his descriptions of worship-worthy or horrifying creatures. Yet, as his final sentence indicates, humans are in the process of transforming themselves into these during their lifetimes. In Catholic thought, the process of becoming a saint is usually associated with moral practices, and indeed, I would agree that whether one acts rightly is the most important part of a person’s identity. But idiosyncrasies in personality and talent are also major parts of our ultimate identities. We remember saints not just because of their moral examples, but because of the unique flavors their personalities and lifestyles gave to the meaning of sainthood. I often cite the example of Joan of Arc, whose biography proved so compelling that she inspired Mark Twain, a man famously hostile to organized Christianity, to write a reverent fictionalization of her life.

My emotional response to the recent actions of my peers is, I think, a type of awe. Like it or not, we are all, right now, in the process of shaping our immortal forms — either giving ourselves more dimensions and growing closer to being fully formed human beings, or turning into one-dimensional self-parodies as we give up in the struggle. When I see other students growing in their talents, using them to liven the world, and becoming truly unique in the degree and/or application of their abilities, I have a glimpse of the divine figures they have the potential to become. It is a wondrous thing and a privilege to be able to see other humans in this process. These moments are some of what I treasure most from my time at Holy Cross.

Graduation can be a melancholic time as seniors leave their friends to join other communities. I will not dispute that. But the view of human life as a metamorphic process contextualizes the transition somewhat. It is by setting out that we are able to complete what we have begun at college, coming fully into our own and finishing the process of turning ourselves into masterworks of creation. Thus, while we acknowledge the sadness of this time, let us also see it as a time for amazement. This commencement may prove to be the genesis of, in Lewis’s words, “gods and goddesses.”

Sic Transit Gloria Collegii Sancti Crucis

As Alexander V processed from St. Peter’s Basilica during his Papal Coronation, carried on his gestatorial chair, a man fell to his knees before him, holding a smoldering cloth, and reminded the new Holy Father, “sic transit gloria mundi (thus passes the glory of the world).” These words must have served as a chilling reminder to the new Pope, adorned with the Papal Tiara, seated on a rich throne, clothed in luxurious vestments, emerging from the opulently gilded Basilica, that these things, though certainly “glorious,” will pass – as would the new Pope himself. We are dust, remember, and to dust we shall return. So too everything around us will fall to dust.

The College of the Holy Cross, as I see it now, could use this reminder. And so, as I leave Mt. Saint James, I wish to give this to her. I do so, not out of spite and malice, but rather out of love. As Saint Augustine tells us in his Monastic Rule:

Do not consider yourselves unkind when you point out such faults. Quite the contrary, you are not without fault yourselves when you permit your brothers to perish because of your silence. Were you to point out their misdeeds, correction would at least be possible. If your brother had a bodily wound which he wished to conceal for fear of surgery, would not your silence be cruel and your disclosure merciful? 

Holy Cross, as my Alma Mater, has given me many of my greatest memories, my greatest friends, and my greatest share of wisdom. I will always be thankful to her and her faculty, who provided an incomparable opportunity of study, and I will always be thankful to her as the catalyst for my growth in faith and love of God. These are the great goods available at Holy Cross, through Holy Cross. These are the reasons so many of us love her and continue to love her. The fervent love of God and the wisdom of the ages have seeped into the very soil of Mt. Saint James. They will forever live here as long as Holy Cross does.

But, that does not mean our beloved college is without her faults. The College has made a drastic turn down the path of worldly glory, further obscuring these foundational and all important principals. In the pursuit of wealth, her endowment grows as does students’ tuition. Each year we are faced with an exorbitantly high bill for our education that creeps higher and higher, percentage by percentage. The Holy Cross website now lists the cost of attendance, tuition along with room and board and other fees, at $74,980. 

This growth, we are told, is necessary for the goods that the College provides. It is not because they want more money, but because students need more services. It is under the guise of student betterment that the College expands her bureaucracy, draining our bank accounts so that they might flood our emails with correspondence from 82 offices on campus. Only one of these  constitutes the entirety of the academic sector. The other 81 are distinct from the immediate function of the College as an educational institution. I’m not suggesting all these are unnecessary. We need an Admissions office and we need Public Safety. But, do we need both an Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and a distinct Office of Multicultural Education? With each of these offices come more Directors, Deans, and Assistant-Deans. With each of these offices come more programming and responsibilities to justify their existence as distinct departments. With each of these offices comes a greater financial burden to the students.

This financial burden runs counter to the College’s apparent dedication to Social Justice. We are inundated with the message of equity, with the condemnations of privilege, and with calls to service and charity. But, might I contend, what is more inequitable than an elite college driving up her already steep cost of attendance? What is more privileged than sitting on an endowment of $1.04 billion, which, I might add, has only increased since the beginning of the pandemic? And it has been no small increase, but a growth of $254 million from its $785.9 million as reported June 30, 2019. The endowment, more than anything, proves the great farce of the College’s supposed dedication to the underprivileged and impoverished. She twists the Catholic principles of Social Justice and embraces Critical Race Theory to condemn many of her students as perpetrators of privilege, while sitting upon vast sums of money to ensure her own stability into perpetuity. She must maintain this endowment to assure that she survives into the ages to come, as a singularly elite institution among the many in our world. She must reserve these stores of money to continue promulgating a message that aligns with the popular trends of the world, so as to glorify herself in its eyes. She, herself, must be seen “fighting” the injustices of the world, and she needs this money to make sure she’s always here, ready and able to do so.

In this quest for glory, the College has pitted herself against the Holy Catholic Church. Rather than seeing herself as a faithful daughter of the Church, her true mother, she has claimed a position of parallel authority. As a Catholic institution, the College of the Holy Cross holds a privileged position in being able to express and develop the varied and complex teachings of the Catholic Church. She can encourage debate and deepen the understanding of the faithful. There is room for discussion within the bounds of the Catholic Church. However, she has sold the long standing teachings and traditions of the Church for 30 pieces of silver, and instead embraced those beliefs which the World wants the Church to believe. She has antagonized and ignored Bishop McManus in his calls for basic adherence to the Church's teachings on gender, sexuality, and even life; a pride flag hangs from her Chaplains Office, and she has publicly condemned McManus for defending life at all stages. She did not stand by him as students started a petition to disinvite him from graduation. Further, through offices like the McFarland Center she presents a warped view of the Catholic Church as no more than a vehicle for charitable service, committed only to a watered down form of “kindness” and the promulgation of the shallow contemporary view of “diversity.” She fails to address the fact that at a Catholic College, no more than 300 students attend Mass on Sundays. 

It would be daunting to defend the Church and all she teaches in this day and age. No doubt, the College of the Holy Cross has ignored this privileged opportunity in search of acceptance among the world – in search of glory among the world. Indeed, she has sold the very core of her being and mission in order that the world might praise her as progressive. She seeks better statistics, better rankings, better objective quanta by which she might prove herself as important, as elite, as glorious.

But, what has she lost? She has lost the simple, intrinsic beauty that makes each individual a beloved child of God, in exchange for a corrupted view of the individual as an agglomeration of various “identities.” She has lost the quiet, internal joy that sprouts from a life lived in virtue and true contrition for our own sins and failings in exchange for a view of evil that directs us only outwards towards all-encompassing societal ills so that we can ignore our personal vices. She has lost the wealth of knowledge and wisdom passed on to us from generations gone by, in exchange for classes and faculty who seek to destroy and reshape all that has passed into their own creation. She has lost the true glory that comes from turning all things over to Christ, the eternal glory that never fades, in exchange for that worldly glory that will fade in the blink of an eye.

Indeed, despite the College’s purported dedication to her Jesuit identity, she has lost this identity’s cornerstone, which serves as the motto for the Society of Jesus itself: Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam, For the Greater Glory of God.

Though the time when Holy Cross, as all things in this world, must pass into dust has not yet come – the eye of her lifetime has not yet blinked – my time to pass from her grounds has arrived. I leave her with great sadness, both for those things here which I love and for my fears about her future. At the end of Walter Miller’s novel A Canticle for Leibowitz, a contingent of monks leave the earth, tasked with carrying on the Catholic Faith even as the earth meets a nuclear apocalypse. While atom bombs detonate in the distance:

The last monk, upon entering [the spaceship], paused in the lock. He stood in the open hatchway and took off his sandals. "Sic transit mundus," he murmured, looking back at the glow. He slapped the soles of his sandals together, beating the dirt out of them.

In this act, he follows the instruction of Christ missioning his Apostles to go out and spread the Good News in Matthew’s Gospel. Though He gives them the power to heal the sick and cast out demons, He also tells them, “if any one will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town.” The monks leave earth, bringing the Faith and Church of Christ with them, for neither was received on earth; the world neglected God and so destroyed itself. In this twist on the phrase, sic transit gloria mundi, only the world (mundus) passes away, not its glory. The earth’s true glory – the Church of Christ – doesn’t pass, for She will live on in the cosmos through the witness of the monks.

As I leave Holy Cross, I know it’s my time to dust off my sandals. The Catholic Church, in her beauty and greatness, is not fully received here, nor are decent values. As the dust from the Apostle’s sandals would remind those who did not accept Christ of their mortality – that they are dust – and thus hasten them to accept Christ’s message, might this article serve as a similar reminder to Holy Cross. May this article, this dust off my feet, serve not as her condemnation, but fill her heart with repentance and remind her of her dependence on God. Might she remember she is mortal, that her glory will fade. Unless, and only unless, she directs all things Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam. And, might I remember to bring that which is truly glorious with me to the whole world.

Reflecting On My Time With The Fenwick Review

As I get ready to graduate, I reflect on my time at Holy Cross. In particular, I think of my time as a conservative college student and all it entailed. Between receiving threats for writing for The Fenwick Review and the verbal attacks for being a College Republicans e-board member, I am reminded of the importance of conservative student voices, especially in a time of deep division.

I did not become aware of The Fenwick Review until my sophomore year. After being convinced by two members to join and feeling a strong desire to write after the failed ENGAGE Summit, I co-wrote an article with now Co-Editor, Andrew Buck. Soon after I joined, I immediately became aware of its reputation among the campus. As soon as the printed copies were distributed, people purposely threw stacks into the trash, made fun of anybody whose name appeared in the issue, and went so far as to post threats to its members. People have stopped writing for The Fenwick Review, fearing for their reputations both on campus and when applying for jobs. Some at Holy Cross argue that this proves how terrible The Fenwick Review is and that those involved deserve this hatred and fear. But, it does not-- it reflects its importance.

This emotional response shows the unfortunate state our country is in. Each article written is meant to cover the latest political news, happenings on campus, or Catholic values and questions. They bring up hard topics that can be difficult to discuss. Holy Cross prides itself on the promotion of dialogue to understand each other and expand our thinking. On a college campus in particular, the conservative voice is what the community lacks and what it needs most. Too often the promotion of dialogue is not a dialogue at all; it is nothing more than code for conversations where one side is right and tells the other it’s wrong.

Agreement with every article in The Fenwick Review is not the goal of the publication. There have been anti-Trump articles and pro Trump articles. There have been coronavirus articles of varying perspectives, from Governor Cuomo’s response to Holy Cross’ refusal to lower tuition. The Fenwick Review stands by its conservative and Catholic ideals, but each article is written by one or two students on a topic of their own choosing. Too often, the response to articles is emotionally charged based on the title and a pull quote or two.

But, I will always remember a conversation that I had with a former fellow student. An older student approached me after a new issue came out asking to talk. He was openly progressive, and I had heard him make vicious remarks about The Review. As nervous as I was, I agreed, and we sat down to chat in Cool Beans. With my anxiety at an all time high, he simply asked how I got the idea for my latest article about my thoughts on the importance of learning about and discussing other viewpoints. He told me how he used to write off The Fenwick Review, insult it, and rarely even read the articles. But he said that, even though he does not agree with the publication and what we write, he wants to be able to engage with its writers and discuss their articles in order to understand their viewpoints, despite his disagreements.

This interaction reflects the exact reason why The Fenwick Review benefits the Holy Cross community. Too often, conservatives are villainized. Although this will inevitably continue on campus and in the country as a whole, giving conservative students a voice assures that they can spread their ideas, and hopefully help other students, even just a few, to engage in real dialogue. It is unlikely that many students will read The Fenwick Review and magically become Conservative or Catholic (hey, I’m still Greek Orthodox and write for it), but for those who actually take the time to read our publication, they will realize that there can be arguments that they can vehemently disagree with and yet respect their merits.

The Fenwick Review taught me the importance of standing by my conservative values. As I prepare to leave Holy Cross, I will forever be grateful for the strength, reflection, and community The Review brought me. Now more than ever in our divided country, I hope The Fenwick Review continues to ask more, and I look forward to going from Social Media Editor and Staff Writer to a proud donor. What a ride it has been.